jǐngrán+
(jǐng·rán
neat; orderly · right; correct [→ [tidy; methodical; shipshape]]
井然)‐yǒuxù+
(yǒu·xù
having · order; sequence [→ [methodical; systematic; in good order; regular]]
有序)
👈🏼 Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”
[Notes: Tap/click on a Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) expression to reveal its “flashcard”; tap/click on a “flashcard” or its Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) expression to hide the “flashcard”. 📖 📄 ➕ icons mean 📖 Reveal All, 📄 Reveal Advanced, and ➕ Reveal + Symbols re all the “flashcards” in the heading, paragraph, etc. that they are placed at the beginning of.]
We in the Mandarin field should keep in mind that many Mandarin-speaking people were taught to believe in evolution, and thus tend to not believe in God. The
Shēngmìng Láizì Chuàngzào Ma?
((Shēngmìng
Life
生命)
(Lái·zì
Came · From
来自
來自)
(Chuàng·zào
Initiating · {Making, Creating} → [Creating]
创造
創造)
(Ma
[? ptcl for “yes/no” questions]
吗
嗎)?
→ [Was Life Created? (lc)])
(Was Life Created? (lc)) brochure and the
Shēngmìng de Qǐyuán—Zhíde Sīkǎo de Wǔ Ge Wèntí
((Shēngmìng
Life
生命)
(de
’s
的)
(Qǐ·yuán
{Rising → [Starting]} · Source → [Origin]
起源/原)—(Zhí·de
Worth · Getting → [Worth]
值得)
(Sī·kǎo
{Thinking About} · Examining
思考)
(de
’s
的)
(Wǔ
Five
五)
(Ge
[mw]
个
個/个)
(Wèn·tí
Asking · Subjects → [Questions]
问题
問題)
→ [The Origin of Life—Five Questions Worth Asking (lf)])
(The Origin of Life—Five Questions Worth Asking (lf)) brochure were originally published back in 2010, but they are still considered current publications, and relatively recently, the English version of the Was Life Created? brochure was updated to the December 2022 Printing, and the Mandarin version of it was updated to the February 2023 Printing. So, it would be good for us to consider some of the expressions used in the Mandarin versions of the Was Life Created? and Origin of Life brochures, which can be so helpful when discussing the fundamentally important question of whether life was created.
In Good Order
This week’s MEotW, “jǐngrán
(jǐng·rán
neat; orderly · right; correct [→ [tidy; methodical; shipshape]]
井然)‐yǒuxù
(yǒu·xù
having · order; sequence [→ [methodical; systematic; in good order; regular]]
有序)”, occurs in paragraph 12 of the QUESTION 2 section of the Origin of Life brochure, which section is entitled, in English, “Is Any Form of Life Really Simple?”:
English:
Imagine that you have been allowed past the “security guard” and are now inside the cell. The interior of a prokaryotic cell is filled with a watery fluid that is rich in nutrients, salts, and other substances. The cell uses these raw ingredients to manufacture the products it needs. But the process is not haphazard. Like an efficiently run factory, the cell organizes thousands of chemical reactions so that they take place in a specific order and according to a set timetable.
Mandarin (WOL, Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音)+ 🔗):
📖 📄 ➕
Jiǎshè
(Jiǎ·shè
{being artificial} · {set up} → [suppose]
假设
假設)
nǐ
(you
你)
dédào
(dé·dào
{have gotten} · {arriving at}
得到)
“ménwèi
(mén·wèi
door/entrance · {guarding (person’s)}
门卫
門衛)”
yǔnxǔ
(permitting
允许
允許),
kěyǐ
(kě·yǐ
{are able} · [suf]
可以)
jìnrù
({to enter}
进入
進入)
xìbāo
(xì·bāo
tiny · womb → [cell]
细胞
細胞)
“gōngchǎng
(gōng·chǎng
work · factory → [factory]
工厂
工廠)”
le
([(at the end of a phrase/sentence) indicates a change]
了).
Nǐ
(you
你)
huì
(will
会
會)
fāxiàn
(fā·xiàn
{send out → [develop]} · {appearing of} → [find]
发现/见
發現/見)
yuánhé+
(yuán·hé
primitive · {pit (of a fruit) → [nucleus]} → [prokaryotic]
原核)
xìbāo
(xì·bāo
tiny · womb → [cell]
细胞
細胞)
nèi
(inside
内
內)
mǎn
({filled with}
满
滿)
shì
(is
是)
xiàng
(like
像/象)
shuǐ
(water
水)
yíyàng
(yí·yàng
{(of) one} · form → [the same]
一样
一樣)
de
(’s
的)
yètǐ+
(yè·tǐ
fluid · {bodies → [substances]} → [fluids]
液体
液體),
zhèixiē
(zhèi·xiē
this · {indefinite number of} → [these]
这些
這些)
yètǐ
(yè·tǐ
fluid · {bodies → [substances]} → [fluids]
液体
液體)
hányǒu
(hán·yǒu
{hold in the mouth → [contain]} · have
含有)
fēngfù
(fēng·fù
rich · abundant
丰富
豐富)
de
(’s
的)
yǎngfèn+
(yǎng·fèn
supporting · components → [nutrients]
养分
養分),
yán
(salts
盐
鹽),
hé
({(together) with} → [and]
和
和/龢)
qítā
(qí·tā
them · otherwise’s → [other]
其他)
wùzhì
(wù·zhì
matter · substances → [substances]
物质
物質).
Xìbāo
(Xì·bāo
tiny · womb → [cell]
细胞
細胞)
yòng
(uses
用)
zhèixiē
(zhèi·xiē
this · {indefinite number of} → [these]
这些
這些)
“yuán+
(original → [raw]
原)
cáiliào
(cái·liào
{timber → [material]} · materials → [materials]
材料)”
zhìzào
(zhì·zào
{to manufacture} · {to make} → [to manufacture]
制造
製造)
suǒxū
(suǒ·xū
{those which} · {are needed}
所需)
de
(’s
的)
dōngxi
(dōng·xi
easts · wests → [things]
东西
東西),
dàn
(but
但)
guòchéng
(guò·chéng
{to be passed through} · {journey → [procedure]} → [process]
过程
過程)
bìng
(definitely
并
並/竝/并)
bú
(not
不)
shì
(is
是)
záluàn+
(zá·luàn
mixed · random → [disorderly]
杂乱
雜亂)‐wú
(without
无
無/无)‐zhāng
(sections → [structure]
章)
de
({’s (process)}
的).
Xìbāo
(Xì·bāo
tiny · womb → [cell]
细胞
細胞)
hǎoxiàng
(hǎo·xiàng
{well → [very much]} · {is like}
好像/象)
yùnzuò
(yùn·zuò
transports · does → [operates]
运作
運作)
shùnchàng+
(shùn·chàng
{being following → [being suiting]} · {being smooth} → [smoothly]
顺畅
順暢)
de
(’s
的)
gōngchǎng
(gōng·chǎng
work · factory → [factory]
工厂
工廠)
nàyàng
(nà·yàng
that · {form → [way]}
那样
那樣),
zài
(in
在)
xìbāo
(xì·bāo
tiny · womb → [cell]
细胞
細胞)
li
(inside
里
裡/裏)
jìnxíng
(jìn·xíng
{are advanced} · {are walked → [are carried out]}
进行
進行)
de
(’s
的)
wúshù
(wú·shù
without · number
无数
無數)
huàxué+
(huà·xué
{transforming → [chemistry]} · studying → [chemical]
化学
化學)
fǎnyìng
(fǎn·yìng
{in the reverse direction} · respondings → [reactions]
反应
反應)
quándōu
(quán·dōu
completely · all
全都)
ànshí
(àn·shí
{according to} · {(particular) times} → [on schedule]
按时
按時)
jìnxíng
(jìn·xíng
{are advanced} · {are walked → [are carried out]}
进行
進行),
érqiě
(ér·qiě
and · moreover
而且)
jǐngrán+
(jǐng·rán
{are orderly} · {are correct}
井然)‐yǒuxù+
(yǒu·xù
{are having} · sequence
有序).
In the above examples, “jǐngrán
(jǐng·rán
neat; orderly · right; correct [→ [tidy; methodical; shipshape]]
井然)‐yǒuxù
(yǒu·xù
having · order; sequence [→ [methodical; systematic; in good order; regular]]
有序)” is used to translate the English phrase “in a specific order”. In contrast, past MEotW “záluàn
(zá·luàn
miscellaneous; mixed · {in disorder}; chaotic; random; arbitrary → [disorderly; mixed; in a jumble/mess; chaotic]
杂乱
雜亂)‐wú
({not having}; without; no
无
無/无)‐zhāng
(sections [→ [order | rules; regulation; constitution | composition; structure; system; pattern]]
章)”, which occurs earlier in the example paragraph above, is used to translate the English word “haphazard”.
Yes, in contrast to the haphazard mess that any system generated by random chance would be (if anything even resembling a system gets generated at all), the system inside our cells for manufacturing needed products actually operates with a very high degree of organization, orderliness, and efficiency. This is strong evidence that our cells were actually not produced by the random processes of evolution, but rather, by an organized and orderly intelligent Creator.
Not in Good Order, in Good Order
Of particular interest to Mandarin field language learners, if we look at Chinese characters, which were designed by imperfect humans, it would be fair to describe the way they were designed as being haphazard, even compared to other human-designed systems. For example, the book The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, on page 111, says:
Comparatively speaking, the Japanese syllabaries are quite simple and efficient. Their forty-seven symbols do a reasonably good job of representing the sound system of Japanese with its mere 113 different syllables. In contrast, the Chinese syllabary, which must cope with a far more complex syllabic system (3,877 syllables in earlier Chinese and 1,277 in current standard Chinese if tones are included, 398 if tones are excluded), is not only appallingly large but also quite unstandardized and hence extremely inefficient—all this of course due to the fact that it has not been manipulated and refined like the Japanese syllabaries but throughout its history right down to today has evolved in a more or less haphazard manner.
One of the ways in which Chinese characters are relatively haphazard is in how they represent their pronunciations. Even though many characters have phonetic (relating to speech sounds) elements that supposedly relate to how they are to be pronounced, ultimately, there is no consistent, overall system such that if a character is like this, then its pronunciation must thus be that—if you bump into a Chinese character that you never learned, or that you learned but forgot (this character amnesia actually happens all the time, even to experienced native Mandarin speakers), then ultimately you can only guess at how to pronounce it!
Speaking of phonetic elements, characters are so old that the phonetic elements of characters that have them may actually be based on old pronunciations that are different from the modern day pronunciations that these phonetic elements appear to modern readers to indicate. So, even the supposedly phonetic elements of characters are not reliable indicators of the modern Mandarin pronunciations of these characters, adding to the overall haphazard nature of characters.
Another haphazard aspect of characters is the many homographs among them, that is, different words that are written with the same characters, but that have different possible pronunciations and meanings, such that one must examine the context to deduce which pronunciation and meaning are actually the intended ones in any given situation.
In marked contrast, Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) is a simple, elegant, consistent system of representing modern Mandarin speech, such that if Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) expressions are written a certain way, then they must be pronounced a certain way—well-designed, neat, and orderly, not having “evolved in a more or less haphazard manner” like Chinese characters!
For convenience:
The direct link for the current-generation Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) Plus / Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音)+ resource for the Origin of Life brochure is:
The short link for Chinese field language-learning links for the Origin of Life brochure is:
More Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) and Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) Plus / Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音)+ web material based on the Mandarin Origin of Life brochure will be made available in the Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音) Plus / Pīnyīn
(Pīn·yīn
{Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin]
拼音)+ web resource as time allows.
