Tag: Etymology

Categories
Culture History Science

kǎlā’OK

kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK) ← Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

The selection of this week’s MEotW, “kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK)”, was inspired by a Twitter thread of epic linguistic and etymological nerdery that I recently came across, which begins with this tweet:

Here are some of the tweets in this thread, which summarize how “kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK)” became a word in Mandarin:

Borrowed Culture

In addition to “kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK)”, another Mandarin word which borrowed from Japanese culture, which borrowed from Western culture, is “wĂ©nhuĂ  (wĂ©n·huĂ  {(with) writing} · transformed (system) → [culture] | {(with) writing} · transformed → [cultural] æ–‡ćŒ–)”, the Mandarin word for culture itself. As the MEotW post about that word says:

To translate the Western concept of culture, the Japanese coined the word bunka, which is written æ–‡ćŒ– (see Liu, Zhengtan et al. 1984, s.v. wenhua). The Chinese imported this character combination from Japan and pronounced it according to the rules of their own language: wĂ©nhuĂ .
—“Two Steps Toward Digraphia in China”, by Xieyan Hincha

So, people going on about “pure” Chinese culture are ignorant or in denial about the reality of how other cultures have influenced Chinese culture, and about what a great, enriching thing that can be. Anyone who has been in a group or congregation with people predominantly from a single cultural background, and who has also had the pleasure of being in a group or congregation with people from a variety of cultural backgrounds, has had the opportunity to see how the atmosphere of the latter situation can be a breath of fresh air compared to the relatively narrow—and potentially narrow-minded—cultural worldview that is sometimes allowed to be present in the former situation. Some parts of the world too are starting to realize the advantages of considering various cultural inputs, compared to trying to be productive or creative in a monocultural bubble.

Indeed, the proud “not invented here” logic of Chinese cultural purists who would, for example, reject PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) because it uses letters from the Latin alphabet would also require us to reject things like European-style punctuation, Arabic numerals, and kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK) because of their foreign-to-China origins. But, Chinese culture without kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK)? How dreary! Next, they’ll be wanting us to do long division using Chinese characters—捁侀, äčćäč, äž€ćƒć…«ç™Ÿäž‰ćć…­, 
—instead of Arabic numbers, and they’ll be wanting us to read and decipher Chinese writings the old-fashioned way, without the “crutch” of those decadent European punctuation marks! đŸ˜±

(Of course, with kǎlā’OK (karaoke ćĄæ‹‰OK), as with anything that may involve worldly culture and music—which can possibly include some bad things along with the good things—Christians must be selective, exercising good spiritual judgement and following their Bible-trained consciences.)

As members of the international brotherhood of Jehovah’s people, and as ones “taught by Jehovah” himself, we need not be content with, let alone proud of, a particular way of doing things prescribed by human, worldly Chinese cultural tradition.—1 Peter 5:9; Isaiah 54:13; 1 Corinthians 1:31; 1 John 2:17; Mark 7:1–13.

Categories
Theocratic

hĂčdĂČng

hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•) ← Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

One of the publications that is now recommended to be used on Bible studies is the Yǒngyuǎn XiǎngshĂČu Měihǎo de ShēngmĂŹng—HĂčdĂČng ShĂŹ ShĂšngjÄ«ng KĂšchĂ©ng ((Yǒng·yuǎn Eternally · {Far (in Time)} æ°žèżœ 氞遠) (Xiǎng·shĂČu Enjoy · Receive äș«ć—) (Měi·hǎo Beautiful · Good çŸŽć„œ) (de ’s 的) (ShēngmĂŹng Life ç”Ÿć‘œ)—(HĂč·dĂČng {Each Other} · Moving → [Interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•) (ShĂŹ (Type ćŒ) (ShĂšng·jÄ«ng Holy · Scriptures → [Bible] ćœŁç» 聖經) (KÚ·chĂ©ng Lessons · Procedure → [Course] èŻŸçš‹ èȘČ繋) → [Enjoy Life Forever!—An Interactive Bible Course (lff)]) (Enjoy Life Forever! (lff)) book. Looking at the Mandarin title of this book, you may have wondered: What does “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” mean?

_Enjoy Life Forever!_ bk. title page (jw.org CHS+Pinyin)

(The above screenshot from jw.org shows light-coloured text on a dark background because I have set jw.org’s relatively new Appearance Settings to do so. As the related JW News article says, “some users prefer this setting because the screen is less bright. This may help reduce eyestrain, especially at night or in other low-light environments.” Most PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus web resources (short link: tiandi.info/pyp) also have a Night Theme available, that can be turned on or off using the ☀/🌙 button on their web pages.)

You may surmise that “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” corresponds with the “Interactive” in Enjoy Life Forever!​—An Interactive Bible Course, and you would be right. Now, let’s take a closer look at the morphemes in “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” to see how they work in a way that makes “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” correspond as well as it does with the English word “interactive”, which means “acting upon or influencing each other”.

Morphemic Breakdown

As the PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus information for “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” shows us, its first morpheme “hĂč- (mutually; {[(with)] each other} äș’)” means “mutually; [(with)] each other”. It’s the “hĂč- (mutually; {[(with)] each other} äș’)” in “hĂčxiāng ({each other} äș’盞) gǔlĂŹ (gǔ·lĂŹ {drum → [rouse]} · encourage → [encourage] éŒ“ćŠ± éŒ“ć‹”)”, which means “encourage one another”.

The other morpheme “dĂČng (move [→ [stir | arouse | change; alter]] 抹 拕)” basically means “move”. In some contexts, it means to move physically, as it does in “dĂČngwĂč (dĂČng·wĂč moving · thing → [animal] 抚物 拕物)”, which literally means “moving thing”, and is used to mean “animal”. (Interestingly, the English word “animal” is related to the word “animate”, which can mean “bring into action or movement”.) In other contexts, “dĂČng (move [→ [stir | arouse | change; alter]] 抹 拕)” means to move emotionally, as it does in “gǎndĂČng (gǎn·dĂČng feeling · moved | {make to feel} · move æ„ŸćŠš æ„Ÿć‹•)”. In yet other contexts, “dĂČng (move [→ [stir | arouse | change; alter]] 抹 拕)” is used to effectively mean “change; alter”.

Breaking down “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng mutually; {[(with)] each other} · moving → [interacting; interaction; interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•)” into its morphemes helps us to see that “hĂč- (mutually; {[(with)] each other} äș’)” corresponds with the “inter-” part of “interactive”, and that “dĂČng (move [→ [stir | arouse | change; alter]] 抹 拕)” corresponds with the “active” (“acting [up]on”) part.

Interactive Indeed

The English word “interactive” has a particular meaning in the world of computing, which is “responds to user activity”.

Interestingly, the Enjoy Life Forever! book even has some interactivity in its paper form, with its “Lesson completed on:” and “Goal” sections allowing room for a user to write in them with a pencil or pen. This is in addition to the limited interactivity that any paper publication offers a user, such as being able to write notes in the margins or to highlight or underline text.

The Enjoy Life Forever! book in the PDF file format—a computer file format that is conceptually rooted in the world of paper—adds the ability for a user to tap/click on links to load the web pages on which the videos mentioned in the book can be played. As we move on to more computer-native formats, we find that on the jw.org website and in the JW Library app, where of course links are available for playing the videos, a user can tap/click on text fields in the “Lesson completed on:” and “Goal” sections and type text into them that will be “remembered”. Also, a user can tap/click on the checkboxes in the “Goal” section, and those checkboxes will “remember” and show whether they are checked or unchecked.

As discussed in the JW Broadcasting—January 2021 program, when it comes to the more general meaning of the English word “interactive”, “acting upon or influencing each other”, the Enjoy Life Forever! book in every format is designed to engage and involve people more than past Bible study textbooks did. It indeed qualifies as “interactive”, or as we say in Mandarin, “hĂčdĂČng (hĂč·dĂČng {each other} · moving → [interactive] äș’抚 äș’ć‹•) shĂŹ (type ćŒ)”.

(By the way, just as is possible on this blog, in the unofficial PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus material for the Enjoy Life Forever! book, users can interactively tap/click on PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) expressions to show/hide, as desired, flashcards showing English meanings, Simplified character(s), Traditional character(s) (if they’re different), etc. for these expressions.)

For convenience:

The direct link for the current generation PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus resource for the Enjoy Life Forever! book is:

The short link for Chinese field language-learning links for the Enjoy Life Forever! book is:

More PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) and PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus web material based on the Mandarin Enjoy Life Forever! book will be made available in the PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) Plus web resource as time allows.

Categories
Culture Current Events Language Learning

tǎngpíng

tǎngpĂ­ng (tǎng·pĂ­ng lie; recline · {[to be] flat} èșșćčł) ← Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

I recently came across an interesting article on the website Sixth Tone*, about this week’s MEotW, “tǎngpĂ­ng (tǎng·pĂ­ng lie; recline · {[to be] flat} èșșćčł)”.

Screenshot of the article “Tired of Running in Place, Young Chinese ‘Lie Down’ ”, on the Sixth Tone website

This Sixth Tone article is about how some cool cats are dropping out of the Chinese rat race.

The article briefly describes how this word is being used now by people in China:

China’s young people have coined yet another neologism to reflect their growing disillusionment with the country’s often oppressive work culture. Rather than trying to keep up with society’s expectations or fight them, many are resolving to simply “lie down.”

The new lifestyle buzzword, tang ping, stems from a now-deleted post on forum site Tieba. Unlike similar, previous terms to have had their time in the spotlight in recent years, tang ping is an action rather than a feeling — resolving to just scrape by, exerting the bare minimum effort at an unfulfilling job, as opposed to the futility of raging against the capitalist machine.

Chinese “Rat Race”

The above reference to China’s “often oppressive work culture” may remind one of the English term “rat race”, which is referred to later in the above-mentioned article. The Online Etymology Dictionary tells us about an early application of “rat race”:

A rat race is … a simple game of “follow the leader” in fighter planes. The leader does everything he can think of — Immelmanns, loops, snap rolls, and turns, always turns, tighter and tighter. [Popular Science, May 1941]

Of course, “rat race” also went on to refer to “fiercely competitive struggle”. Wikipedia describes it this way:

A rat race is an endless, self-defeating, or pointless pursuit. The phrase equates humans to rats attempting to earn a reward such as cheese, in vain. It may also refer to a competitive struggle to get ahead financially or routinely.

The term is commonly associated with an exhausting, repetitive lifestyle that leaves no time for relaxation or enjoyment.

The Most Rational Choice?

Continuing on, the Sixth Tone article goes into an interview with Huang Ping, a literature professor at East China Normal University who researches youth culture:

“The state is worried about what would happen if everyone stopped working,” said Huang. But he doesn’t necessarily agree with the media reactions. “Humans aren’t merely tools for making things,” he said.

To lie down is a rational choice rather than a negative attitude, Huang explained. For some young people, it’s a way for them to unburden themselves. “When you can’t catch up with society’s development — say, skyrocketing home prices — tang ping is actually the most rational choice,” he said.




According to Professor Huang, lying down can be seen as the opposite of involution — a decades-old academic term referring to societies becoming trapped in ceaseless cycles of competition that resurfaced last year as an online buzzword in China. [“NĂšijuǎn (NĂši·juǎn inner · rolling → [involution] ć†…ć· ć…§ć·/æČ)”, the Mandarin word for this, is a past MEotW.] “In a relatively good social environment, people may feel involuted, but at least they’re trying,” he said. “If it’s worse, people will tang ping.”

A Rational Reaction of Mandarin-Learners to Chinese Characters?

Many who are learning Mandarin to help in the Mandarin language field find the Chinese characters writing system to be unreasonably difficult to learn and use for regular human beings in their situation. So, kind of like the people mentioned above who are faced with China’s “often oppressive work culture”, they stop trying to deal with Chinese characters and tǎngpĂ­ng (tǎng·pĂ­ng lie; recline · {[to be] flat} èșșćčł), some even ultimately leaving the Mandarin field because of this.

Is this a rational reaction? Besides just toughing it out, is there another alternative to just quitting the Mandarin field because of the extraordinary difficulties associated with Chinese characters?

Chinese characters are indeed so complex and haphazardly designed that trying to learn them (and also remember them) is an unachievably difficult ordeal for all but a talented/stubborn minority. So, for many, it may indeed be rational to tǎngpĂ­ng (tǎng·pĂ­ng lie; recline · {[to be] flat} èșșćčł) when it comes to the traditionally mandated Chinese characters.

Thankfully, though, the simple, elegant PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) writing system for Mandarin offers a reasonable alternative to Chinese characters in many situations. Some may be reluctant to use it because of being concerned about miĂ nzi (miĂ n·zi face · [suf for nouns] [→ [reputation; prestige; esteem; honor]] 靱歐) (a past MEotW) in the eyes of character-loving Chinese traditionalists, but really, as ones who seek to walk on the narrow road Jesus spoke of, the approval of the tradition-loving majority should not be something we are overly concerned about.—Matthew 7:13, 14.

With the help of PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) and a proper focus on Mandarin speech instead of on the traditionally mandated Chinese characters (while just learning as many characters as they reasonably can), many who in all rationality have chosen to tǎngpĂ­ng (tǎng·pĂ­ng lie; recline · {[to be] flat} èșșćčł) with regard to focusing on Chinese characters can still make a go of it in the Mandarin field.—1 Corinthians 14:8–11.

“Everything Was Futile”

Those caught up in getting ahead in this human world ruled by Satan indeed experience the truth of Solomon’s words at Ecclesiastes 1:14:

I saw all the works that were done under the sun,
And look! everything was futile, a chasing after the wind.

Thankfully, God also inspired Solomon to record these words at Ecclesiastes 12:13 that tell us what actually does give meaning and purpose to our lives:

The conclusion of the matter, everything having been heard, is: Fear the true God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole obligation of man.

 

* According to Wikipedia,

Sixth Tone is an online magazine owned by the Shanghai United Media Group, a state media company controlled by the Shanghai committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is published in English from China, and its readership is intended for people in Western countries.

It appears, though, that Sixth Tone is not purely China-boosting political propaganda. Vincent Ni, a senior journalist at the BBC World Service in London, commented as follows:

Mainstream outlets such as the BBC often cite Sixth Tone as their source when reporting on Chinese social stories
 For foreign journalists, it has also shown a diverse and authentic side of China that rarely received much attention elsewhere.




The success of Sixth Tone might be explained by the bigger change happening in China’s media scene over the past few years. Although the Communist Party has intensified its control, it has also allowed many forms of media entrepreneurship. Anecdotally, this is, in part, because of a lack of impact overseas by traditional Chinese party-owned newspapers.




Nowadays, an investment in media is not something that can solely be done by the government. Private capital has also joined the game, and these firms are making profits.




This is a significant change in China’s media scene. While few would be able to fight the Communist Party’s stringent and increasingly sophisticated censorship rules, the abundance of funding has liberated Chinese journalists who have long been complaining about a lack of freedom and resources. These days, journalists working in start-ups say they have greater freedom to report on topics that would not be possible in well-established traditional media

I have found information on Sixth Tone that helps us to understand some of the things that people in China are concerned about. Perhaps such information can help us as we talk to people from China in our ministry. ^