Categories
Culture Language Learning Languages Science

yǔzĂș

yǔzĂș+ (yǔ·zĂș language · {ethnic group → [group of things with common characteristics] → [group]} èŻ­æ— èȘžæ—) đŸ‘ˆđŸŒ Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

[This reposting of a post that was originally posted on February 15, 2021 seems to be a fitting companion to the recent reposting of the post on “yǔxĂŹ (yǔ·xĂŹ language · {tied (things) → [system; family]} èŻ­çł» èȘžçł»)”. It discusses the important basic issue of how Mandarin should be classified as a language, a subject about which much political and cultural propaganda has unfortunately been spread.]

While “language family” seems to be a commonly accepted linguistic term, there does not seem to be universal consensus on what terms to use for subdivisions of language families. This is suggested by the wording used in the Wikipedia article on language families, under the subheading “Structure of a family”:

Language families can be divided into smaller phylogenetic units, conventionally referred to as branches of the family because the history of a language family is often represented as a tree diagram. A family is a monophyletic unit; all its members derive from a common ancestor, and all attested descendants of that ancestor are included in the family. 


Some taxonomists restrict the term family to a certain level, but there is little consensus in how to do so. Those who affix such labels also subdivide branches into groups, and groups into complexes.

So, it seems that one common—but not universal—language classification scheme is:

  • family > branch > group > complex


In contrast, noted American sinologist and University of Pennsylvania Professor of East Asian Languages and Civilizations Victor H. Mair, in his article “The Classification of Sinitic Languages: What Is ‘Chinese’?” (p. 749), sets out a slightly different language classification scheme:

  • family > group > branch > language > dialect

The Mandarin Word for “Language Group”

Regardless of whether we consider language families to be first subdivided into branches or into groups, an accepted and acceptable Mandarin translation for “language group” is this week’s MEotW, “yǔzĂș (yǔ·zĂș language · {ethnic group → [group of things with common characteristics] → [group]} èŻ­æ— èȘžæ—)”, as Prof. Mair confirms in the article (p. 747) mentioned above.

If “zĂș (clan; race; tribe; {ethnic group}; nationality [→ [class or group of things or people with common characteristics]] 族)” seems familiar, perhaps that is because it occurs in some fairly well-known scriptures. For example, the 2019 Edition of the Mandarin New World Translation Bible translates “every nation and tribe and tongue and people” in Revelation 14:6 as “měi (every æŻ) ge ([mw] äžȘ 怋/缇/äžȘ) guĂłzĂș+ (guó·zĂș national · {ethnic group} → [nation] ć›œæ— ćœ‹æ—), bĂčzĂș+ (bĂč·zĂș sectional · {ethnic group} → [tribe] 郚族), yǔyĂĄn (yǔ·yĂĄn language · {(type of) speech} èŻ­èš€ èȘžèš€), hĂ© (and 撌) mĂ­nzĂș+ (mĂ­n·zĂș {(of) people} · {ethnic group} → [people] 民族)”.

The Mandarin Word for “Language Branch”

For reference, the Mandarin word for “language branch” is “yǔzhÄ«+ (yǔ·zhÄ« language · branch èŻ­æ”Ż èȘžæ”Ż)”, as Prof. Mair confirms in the article (p. 747) mentioned above.

It’s interesting to note that according to Prof. Mair’s article (p. 737) mentioned above, not only are Mandarin and Cantonese separate languages (not just “dialects”), it would be more accurate to consider them to be in separate language branches, as defined by the language classisification scheme he uses:

Cantonese and Mandarin are separate languages. Cantonese is not a ‘dialect’ of Mandarin or of Hanyu, and it is grossly erroneous to refer to it as such. Since Cantonese and Mandarin are separate languages (or, perhaps more accurately, separate branches), it is wrong to refer to them as ‘dialects.’ The same holds for Hokkien, Shanghainese, and so forth.

That Mandarin and Cantonese should really be considered to be in separate language branches emphasizes to us politically neutral Mandarin field language learners that we must not repeat or be misled by the politically motivated erroneous assertion that Mandarin, Cantonese, Shanghainese, etc. are just dialects of “Chinese”. That might be even more wrong than saying that English, French, Spanish, etc. are just dialects of “European”!

Categories
Culture Current Events Names Science Theocratic

Tiānfāng‐Yù‐Tán

Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn+ ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights]) đŸ‘ˆđŸŒ Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

[Notes: Tap/click on a PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) expression to reveal its “flashcard”; tap/click on a “flashcard” or its PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) expression to hide the “flashcard”. 📖 📄 ➕ icons mean 📖 Reveal All, 📄 Reveal Advanced, and ➕ Reveal + Symbols re all the “flashcards” in the heading, paragraph, etc. that they are placed at the beginning of.]

Recently, the No. 1 2025 issue of The Watchtower, entitled “An End to War—How?”, became available on jw.org. This week’s MEotW, “Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights])”, appears in the first paragraph of the introduction of the Mandarin version of this issue:

English:

Do you long to live in a world without war or violent conflict? For many, that idea sounds appealing but unrealistic.

Mandarin:

📖 📄 ➕ Nǐ (you 䜠) shĂŹ (are æ˜Ż) bu (not 䞍) shĂŹ (are æ˜Ż) hěn ({very much} ćŸˆ) xiǎng (wanting æƒł) shēnghuĂł ({to live} 生掻) zĂ i (in 朹) yĂ­ (one 侀) ge ([mw] äžȘ 怋/äžȘ) mĂ©iyǒu (mĂ©i·yǒu not · having æČĄæœ‰ æČ’有) zhĂ nzhēng (zhĂ n·zhēng war · contending → [war] 战äș‰ 戰爭) de (’s 的) shĂŹjiĂš (shÏ·jiĂš {generation → [world]} · extent → [world] 侖界) li (inside 里 èŁĄ/èŁ) ne ([? ptcl] 摱)? DuĂŹ (towards → [to] ćŻč 氍) hěn (very ćŸˆ) duƍ (many 〚) rĂ©n (people äșș) lĂĄi (coming 杄 䟆) shuƍ ({to be saying} èŻŽ èȘȘ/èȘŹ), zhĂš (this èż™ 這) jiǎnzhĂ­+ (jiǎn·zhĂ­ {being simple} · {being straight} → [simply] 缀目 簡目) shĂŹ (is æ˜Ż) Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn+ ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights]).

The Tale of the Morphemes

In “Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights])”, “Tiānfāng (Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabia | Arabian] 怩æ–č)”, meaning “Heaven’s Region”, is a Mandarin expression used to refer to “Arabia” or “Arabian”. “YĂš (night; evening 〜 〜/äș±)” here means “Night”, and “TĂĄn ({talk; speak; converse; chat; discuss [about]} è°­ 譚)” here means “Chats”.

When these morphemes are put together in “Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights])”, they on one level of literalness mean “Arabian Night Chats”, and they are used to refer to the collection of Middle Eastern folktales known in English as Arabian Nights, or One Thousand and One Nights.

In the context of the above quote from the Mandarin version of The Watchtower, saying that the idea of a world without war “jiǎnzhĂ­+ (jiǎn·zhĂ­ {being simple} · {being straight} → [simply] 缀目 簡目) shĂŹ (is æ˜Ż) Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights])” is kind of like saying in English that this idea is “just a fairy tale”.

Just a Fairy Tale?

Considering mankind’s ongoing failure to bring about a world without war, it may indeed seem reasonable to doubt how realistic such an idea is. However, the paragraph of The Watchtower quoted above goes on to say:

English:

The Bible reveals why mankind’s efforts to end war have failed. It also explains how you can be sure that worldwide peace is possible and will soon become a reality.

Mandarin:

📖 📄 ➕ ShĂšngjÄ«ng (ShĂšng·jÄ«ng (the) Holy · Scriptures → [the Bible] ćœŁç» 聖經) gĂ osu (tells ć‘ŠèŻ‰ ć‘ŠèšŽ) wǒmen (wǒ·men us · [pl] æˆ‘ä»Ź æˆ‘ć€‘), wĂši‐shĂ©nme ((wĂši for äžș ç‚ș)‐(shĂ©n·me what · [suf] 什äčˆ ä»€/甚éșŒ) → [why]) rĂ©n (humans äșș) bĂč (not 䞍) kěnĂ©ng ({are able} ćŻèƒœ) kĂ o ({to lean on} → [to rely on] 靠) zĂŹjǐ (selves è‡Șć·±) de (’ 的) lĂŹliang (lÏ·liang strength · quantity 抛量) rĂ ng ({to make} èź© èź“) shĂŹjiĂš (shÏ·jiĂš {generation → [world]} · extent → [world] 侖界) hĂ©pĂ­ng (hé·pĂ­ng {be (together) with (one another)} · {be flat, level, even} → [be peaceful (nwtsty-CHS Appx. A2 says this term mainly refers to the absence of war or conflict)] 撌ćčł). BĂșguĂČ (BĂș·guĂČ not · {do pass} → [however] äžèż‡ 侍過) ShĂšngjÄ«ng (ShĂšng·jÄ«ng (the) Holy · Scriptures → [the Bible] ćœŁç» 聖經) yě (also äčŸ) shuƍ (says èŻŽ èȘȘ/èȘŹ), tiānxiĂ + (tiān·xiĂ  heaven · under → [the whole world] 怩䞋) yĂ­dĂŹng (yí·dĂŹng {(with) one} · {setting fixedly} → [definitely] 侀漚) huĂŹ (will 䌚 會) tĂ ipĂ­ng (tĂ i·pĂ­ng supremely · {be flat, level, even → [be peaceful]} ć€Șćčł), Ă©rqiě (Ă©r·qiě and · moreover 而䞔) zhĂš (this èż™ 這) yi (one 侀) tiān (sky → [day] 怩) yǐjing (yǐ·jing already · {has gone through} ć·Č经 ć·Č經) lĂ­ ({being apart from} 犻 雱/犻) wǒmen (wǒ·men us · [pl] æˆ‘ä»Ź æˆ‘ć€‘) bĂč (not 䞍) yuǎn (far èżœ 遠) le ([(at the end of a phrase/sentence) indicates a change] äș†)!

So, let us take advantage of whatever opportunities we have to make good use of the above-mentioned issue of The Watchtower (and its Mandarin version’s available PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł)) in the Mandarin field. Let us do what we can to help Mandarin-speaking sheeplike ones to know that despite the wars now raging in Ukraine and elsewhere, and despite the conflicts threatening to break out, including a possible conflict between China and the USA over Taiwan, “tiānxiĂ + (tiān·xiĂ  heaven · under → [the whole world] 怩䞋) (a past MEotW) yĂ­dĂŹng (yí·dĂŹng {(with) one} · {setting fixedly} → [definitely] 侀漚) huĂŹ (will 䌚 會) tĂ ipĂ­ng (tĂ i·pĂ­ng supremely · {be flat, level, even → [be peaceful]} ć€Șćčł)”—there will definitely be worldwide peace—because of what Jehovah God, our loving Almighty Creator, will accomplish through his own very real Kingdom government.

Evidently an Actual Fairy Tale

In contrast to what the above-mentioned issue of The Watchtower says about the realistic hope of seeing God’s Kingdom make the earth into a peaceful paradise, I recently came across an interesting article entitled “Statistically Speaking, We Should Have Heard from Aliens by Now”, which says:

The paper presents a model to explore the Fermi Paradox and assess the value of SETI in the search for intelligent life. Despite its limitations, the model suggests that the absence of detected electromagnetic signals from alien civilizations can place limits on how many such civilizations exist. Under certain assumptions, the model predicts a 99% chance of detecting at least one signal if the estimated number of civilizations (based on the Drake equation) is around 1.

[For reference, here are the links to the Wikipedia articles regarding some of the terms mentioned above: Fermi paradox; SETI; Drake equation.]

So, while some people these days hope to make contact with space aliens who could maybe help us solve our problems, it seems that scientific evidence is starting to accumulate that shows that such a hope actually is just Tiānfāng‐Yù‐TĂĄn ((Tiān·fāng Heaven’s · {Direction → [Region]} → [Arabian] 怩æ–č)‐(YĂš Night 〜 〜/äș±)‐(TĂĄn Chats è°­ 譚) → [Arabian Nights; One Thousand and One Nights]), like a story out of Arabian Nights.

Rather than looking to space aliens out of science fiction, how much better it would be for people, including those in the Mandarin field, to look to the true God Jehovah, the Extraterrestrial Superintelligence who, as shown by much evidence, created us and has already made contact with us through his Word the Bible and his organization!

Categories
Culture Experiences History Language Learning Technology Theocratic

zĂŹxué‐chĂ©ngcĂĄi

zĂŹxué‐chĂ©ngcĂĄi+ ((zÏ·xuĂ© self · learned; studied è‡Șć­Š è‡Șć­ž)‐(chĂ©ng·cĂĄi became · {capable person} 成才) → [[be] self-taught]) đŸ‘ˆđŸŒ Tap/click to show/hide the “flashcard”

[Notes: Tap/click on a PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) expression to reveal its “flashcard”; tap/click on a “flashcard” or its PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł) expression to hide the “flashcard”. 📖 📄 ➕ icons mean 📖 Reveal All, 📄 Reveal Advanced, and ➕ Reveal + Symbols re all the “flashcards” in the heading, paragraph, etc. that they are placed at the beginning of.]

Recently, jw.org featured the video “Benjamin Boothroyd—A Self-Taught Bible Scholar”. Where the English title of this video uses the expression “self-taught”, the title of the Mandarin version uses this week’s MEotW, “zĂŹxué‐chĂ©ngcĂĄi ((zÏ·xuĂ© self · learned; studied è‡Șć­Š è‡Șć­ž)‐(chĂ©ng·cĂĄi became · {capable person} 成才) → [[be] self-taught])”:

English:

Benjamin Boothroyd—A Self-Taught Bible Scholar

Mandarin:

📖 📄 ➕ BěnjiĂ©mĂ­ng (Benjamin æœŹæ°æ˜Ž æœŹć‚‘æ˜Ž) BĂčsÄ«luĂłyÄ«dĂ© (Boothroyd ćžƒæ€çœ—äŒŠćŸ· ćžƒæ€çŸ…äŒŠćŸ·): ZĂŹxué‐ChĂ©ngcĂĄi+ ((ZÏ·xuĂ© Self · Learned è‡Șć­Š è‡Șć­ž)‐(ChĂ©ng·cĂĄi Became · {Capable Person} 成才) → [Self-Taught]) de (’s 的) ShĂšngjÄ«ng (ShĂšng·jÄ«ng Holy · Scriptures → [Bible] ćœŁç» 聖經) XuĂ©zhě (Xué·zhě Studying · Person → [Scholar] ć­Šè€… ć­žè€…)

The Morphemes

The first morpheme in this week’s MEotW, “zĂŹ (self | from; since è‡Ș)”, here means “self”, as it does in “zĂŹjǐ (self[’s] è‡Șć·±)”. The next morpheme, “xuĂ© (learn/learning | study [→ [imitate]] ć­Š ć­ž)”, here means “learned; studied”. Another expression in which it appears is “xuĂ©sheng (xué·sheng learning · {growing (one) → [student]} → [student; pupil] 歩生 歾生)”, which means “student”. These first two morphemes, when put together to form “zĂŹxuĂ© (zÏ·xuĂ© self · learn; study è‡Șć­Š è‡Șć­ž)”, refer to learning or studying by oneself.

The third morpheme in this week’s MEotW, “chĂ©ng (become; {come to be}; {to turn into}; {to complete}; accomplish; succeed; {fully developed/grown}; {assume [the shape of]}; {to fill} | {to completion} 成)”, here means “became”. It also appears in many other expressions, including “chĂ©ngwĂ©i (chĂ©ng·wĂ©i become · {to be} 成äžș 成ç‚ș)” and “chĂ©nggƍng+ (chĂ©ng·gƍng {becoming [of]}; {accomplishing [of]} · {meritorious service/deed}; achievement → [succeed | success | successful[ly]] æˆćŠŸ)”. The final morpheme “cĂĄi ({only then} | {only (before a number)} | actually; really; very | talent; ability; gift | {capable person} | {person of a certain type} 才 才/çș”)” in this context means “capable person”. So, “chĂ©ngcĂĄi (chĂ©ng·cĂĄi become · {capable person} 成才)” here means “became capable person”, and the entire expression “zĂŹxué‐chĂ©ngcĂĄi ((zÏ·xuĂ© self · learned; studied è‡Șć­Š è‡Șć­ž)‐(chĂ©ng·cĂĄi became · {capable person} 成才) → [[be] self-taught])” literally means “self-learned/studied, became capable person”, and effectively means “self-taught”.

Being Self-Taught in the Mandarin Field

Apart from the introductory organization-sponsored language classes that many of us took, we Mandarin field language learners are pretty much all self-taught with regard to Mandarin, especially when it comes to the somewhat specialized Mandarin that we must use in the Mandarin field. But does being largely self-taught mean that none of us can really be any good at Mandarin? Are we doomed to plateau at a mediocre level at best?

One thing I appreciated from the video mentioned above is that Benjamin Boothroyd, who was self-taught but became a world-class Bible scholar and translator, was motivated only to pursue the truth. As he wrote (as mentioned in the English video starting at the 6:38 mark):

I have no interest to serve but that of truth.

Regarding those with such a focus on the truth, at John 18:37, Jesus said:

For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is on the side of the truth listens to my voice.

Those who are “on the side of the truth” and who listen to Jesus’ voice open themselves up to receiving the most important education we can get. This best possible education comes from Jehovah God himself, not any worldly or human source. As Isaiah 54:13 says:

And all your sons will be taught by Jehovah,
And the peace of your sons will be abundant.

Even when it comes to nontrivial technical matters, Jehovah can help certain ones develop the technical knowledge, skills, and expertise that are needed to accomplish his will. For example, as Exodus 35:30–35 tells us, he did so when some specialized technical work needed to be done when Moses and the Israelites were in the wilderness:

30 Then Moses said to the Israelites: “See, Jehovah has chosen BezÊčal·el the son of UÊčri the son of Hur of the tribe of Judah. 31 He has filled him with the spirit of God, giving him wisdom, understanding, and knowledge of every sort of craftsmanship 32 for making artistic designs, for working with gold, silver, and copper, 33 for cutting and setting stones, and for making all kinds of artistic wood products. 34 And he has put it into his heart to teach, he and O·hoÊčli·ab the son of A·hisÊča·mach of the tribe of Dan. 35 He has filled them with skill to do all the work of a craftsman, an embroiderer, and a weaver using blue thread, purple wool, scarlet material, and fine linen, and of a loom worker. These men will do every sort of work and prepare every sort of design.

Yes, if we focus on the truth and stay open to Jehovah’s direction, we can make “self-taught” also mean “taught by Jehovah”! And since Jehovah created this universe that human scientists, technicians, artists, musicians, etc. are just trying to figure out and work in, he can, if he wants to, even potentially teach us to become more knowledgeable and skilled in certain fields than many worldly humans are, as he may have done with BezÊčal·el and O·hoÊčli·ab.—Psalm 119:98–100.

Modern Resources for Mandarin Self-Learning

In support of our efforts to be successfully self-taught in effectively using Mandarin to praise and serve Jehovah, we today are blessed with many available resources, the likes of which BezÊčal·el, O·hoÊčli·ab, and Mr. Boothroyd would undoubtedly have loved to have had access to. For example, one of the basic things that teaching and learning require is the transfer of information to those seeking to learn, and in that regard, we humans today generally have access to, at reasonable cost, computing—i.e., information-processing—devices that can easily be carried by hand, but that are, in some ways, millions of times more capable than the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) that guided the Apollo 11 spacecraft to the moon.

In addition to these mobile devices themselves, we should also consider the apps and the text, audio, video, etc. content that they enable us to use to help us learn Mandarin. These include the JW Language app, as well as the JW Library app that now allows for content that displays PÄ«nyÄ«n (PÄ«n·yÄ«n {Piecing Together of} · Sounds → [Pinyin] æ‹ŒéŸł). Here are a couple of short links listing some of the resources available for Mandarin field language learners:

No Need to Have Impostor Syndrome in the Mandarin Field

In view of the above, if Jehovah has guided us to serve in the Mandarin field, we need not allow ourselves to be burdened with impostor syndrome, even if we haven’t received extensive worldly training in the Mandarin language. If we let ourselves be “taught by Jehovah” instead of just relying on our own talent or abilities or on mere worldly knowledge or human traditions, and if we resolutely make good use of the available resources and apply ourselves to learn whatever we need to learn in order to do Jehovah’s work well, Jehovah can and will bless our efforts and help us succeed. Also, if we follow Boothroyd’s example and pursue truth rather than “glory from men”, then the truth will be able to set us free from the unnecessary burdens imposed by proud but fallacious human traditions such as those involving Chinese characters. (John 5:41–44; 8:32) As the apostle Paul said at 1 Corinthians 1:26–31:

26 For you see his calling of you, brothers, that there are not many wise in a fleshly way, not many powerful, not many of noble birth, 27 but God chose the foolish things of the world to put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world to put the strong things to shame; 28 and God chose the insignificant things of the world and the things looked down on, the things that are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, 29 so that no one might boast in the sight of God. 30 But it is due to him that you are in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom, 31 so that it may be just as it is written: “The one who boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.”